Skip to main content
The Latest /
Supreme Court

Brett Kavanaugh’s Opening Statement Came From the Judicial Watch Playbook

Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh delivered a belligerent opening statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee last Thursday that hinged on rhetoric put forward by the right-wing organization Judicial Watch.

Last week, Kavanaugh was called before the Senate Judiciary Committee to respond to allegations made against him earlier that day by Christine Blasey Ford, who told senators(link is external) that during a party in the 1980s, a “stumbling drunk” Kavanaugh attacked her, pinning her to a bed, attempting to undress her, groping her, and covering her mouth when she tried to scream for help. Kavanaugh responded to those claims with a public meltdown(link is external) at the hearing, including a series of outright lies(link is external). During his testimony, he blamed Democrats and left-wing activists for forcing him to answer to the accusations “on behalf of the Clintons.” He told the committee(link is external):

This whole two-week effort has been a calculated and orchestrated political hit, fueled with apparent pent-up anger about President Trump and the 2016 election, fear that has been unfairly stoked about my judicial record, revenge on behalf of the Clintons and millions of dollars in money from outside left-wing opposition groups.

As Kavanaugh spoke, behind him sat Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton. On Thursday, Capitol Police told this reporter that the hearings were invitation-only.

(link is external) Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton sits behind Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh during an invitation-only hearing on September 30, 2018. (Screenshot / YouTube via C-SPAN)

Judicial Watch is a conservative political group founded by Larry Klayman in the 1990s to hound the Clintons with lawsuit after lawsuit(link is external) in hopes of scoring information that could be ginned up into a scandal, a drive it carries on to this day under the leadership of Fitton. In recent years, Judicial Watch has propped up false claims(link is external) that the Clinton Foundation acted as a slush fund through which foreign leaders could bribe Clinton during her during her tenure as secretary of state. It also has promoted(link is external) the president’s made-up claims that his campaign was spied on by the Obama administration (on Clinton’s behalf), and has been banging the war drum(link is external) against billionaire philanthropist George Soros, who funds progressive and liberal groups.

Judicial Watch has experienced success spreading its message into mainstream conservative media and reaching President Trump(link is external), who has used the claims to assert(link is external) that the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Department of Justice operate “in favor of Democrats and against Republicans.”

Since Kavanaugh’s nomination to the Supreme Court, the organization has taken up arms in defending Kavanaugh against a perceived conspiracy to block his nomination. In July, the organization stated(link is external) that Kavanaugh’s nomination was a “home run” and that it expected “to see leftist smears, religious bigotry, more threats of violence, etc.” against Kavanaugh.

Andrew McCarthy, a Fox News contributor who spent years(link is external) appearing on Judicial Watch panels, decried the reports of allegations against Kavanaugh as “a setup(link is external).” On September 24(link is external) it claimed the allegations against were part of “a search-and-destroy mission by leftist partisans.” Fitton said(link is external) it would be a “Soviet-style hearing” if Kavanaugh was forced to answer to the Senate Judiciary Committee about the accusations levied against him.

Fitton described(link is external) the allegations against Kavanaugh as a “filibuster of outrageous smears” that “must come to an end.” Fitton said that “partisan leftists want to blow up the confirmation process and destroy Judge Kavanaugh and his family” and asserted(link is external) to viewers: “If you think this is about justice, if you think this is about getting vindication for a woman who’s been assaulted, then, frankly, you’re naïve about what’s going on here … It’s being handled as a political hit-job on Judge Kavanaugh.”